Features

McLaren W1 First Drive: Ferocious Hypercar Transcends the Track

You know things are getting serious when McLaren rolls-out the ‘1’ suffix. The origin story is, of course, the very first road car McLaren ever built, the F1. Designed by visionary Formula 1 aerodynamicist and engineer Gordon Murray, it arrived in 1992 and rendered all other supercars obsolete. The tiny, lightweight F1 embraced carbon-fibre material technology, adopted a radical centre seat driving position with two passengers set back and either side and was powered by a 6.1-litre V12 engine from BMW that might as well have been passed down directly from the Gods. Game-changer? That doesn’t even come close to describing its impact, even if at the time sales didn’t come easy… The P1 was very different. Rather than a unique side project from the Formula 1 team, it was instead a statement piece for McLaren Automotive, a new road car division still in its infancy. It arrived in 2013 and was a wild-eyed showstopper. It traded the long-legged gait and supple suspension of the F1 for a weaponized hybrid system capable of delivering 903bhp and huge blue flames from its drainpipe exhaust. In Race mode, it lowered by 2-inches and its massive concave rear wing extended into the sky. The P1 was all about aerodynamic downforce, crazed acceleration and a snorting, angry soundtrack that mixed venomous twin-turbocharged V8 with the manic whirr of electric motors. Not so much a car as a force of nature. And now there’s this: The W1. It’s a true successor to the P1 with a similar brief and, on the face of it, it evolves rather than radically reinvents McLaren’s vision for the ultimate hypercar. This is not a criticism. How could it be when the result is this dramatic and has such staggering, other-worldly potential? The W1 has 1258bhp delivered to the rear wheels. It’s capable of 0-124 mph in 5.8-seconds, the quarter mile in 9.6-seconds at 167 mph and produces 2205lbs of downforce at 174 mph. The active aerodynamics – particularly a rear wing that extends way out beyond the rear of the car – are pure performance art and deliver massive aerodynamic efficiency. The result, aside from looking extremely cool, is that the W1 is McLaren’s fastest road car around a racetrack. Ever. Their benchmark circuit is the breath-taking Handling Track at the Nardo proving ground in southern Italy, where the W1 beats their previous benchmark, the flyweight McLaren Senna, by three seconds per lap. Or “a lifetime” as they call it in racing. Maybe two lifetimes! Core to the W1’s performance is the new ‘Aerocell’ carbon fibre tub. With integrated seats and a raised footwell to allow for inboard pushrod-operated front suspension – which in turn gives air a clean path to the huge underbody diffuser – it’s light, stiff, space efficient and has been instrumental in McLaren realising a full ground-effect concept. Just like last year’s F1 cars, which were the fastest ever made. There is also an active front wing and the aforementioned complex rear wing dubbed ‘Active Long Tail’. All of which is very admirable. But the ‘anhedral’ or gullwing doors and the fantastically shirnked-wrapped feel to the minimalist, highly-focussed interior are a pretty good side effect. The W1 feels special. Those fixed seats are perhaps a shade more upright than expected, and the driving position is less obviously racecar than, for example, the Aston Martin Valhalla or Ferrari F80. However, once you’ve adjusted the pedals (they move on a slider) and the delicate, slim-rimmed and alcantara-trimmed steering wheel, there’s an overwhelming sense of purpose. The cabin is so tightly tailored and imparts a sense of lightness and agility before you so much as start the all-new 4.0-litre twin-turbocharged V8 engine, which makes 916bhp all on its own and revs to 9200rpm. Reach up to a roof-mounted control panel to find the starter button. Maybe this fighter plane trope is a little corny, but somehow you feel thrilled rather than manipulated. The W1 has a sense of humour as well as all that motorsport-derived sophistication. There’s a short delay, but when the engine does fire it’s instant – as the high-powered hybrid system negates the need for an old-school starter motor. A sharp flare of revs tells you that this engine is hyper-responsive and angry. On some deep level your brain and body have been sent all the signals required to prepare for something new and intense. Ahead of us, an empty Mugello racetrack, so press and hold the blue button next to the red starter to select Race mode. The centre display graphic shows the W1’s transformation in real time as it lowers by 37mm at the front and 17mm at the rear whilst simultaneously undocking all that active aero goodness. Race mode is not road legal and is geo-locked. You can show your friends and neighbours the aero dance, but it won’t allow you to select a gear to actually drive unless you’re at a circuit. Incidentally, the rocker switches either side of the display binnacle allow further options now: Toggle up the Handling control on the left for Race+ (for F1-spec super smooth tracks) or stick to Race for gnarlier ones. On the right toggle select ‘GP’ for sustained performance over a stint or ‘Sprint’ to unleash all 1258bhp for a time attack. There’s also a DRS and Boost function on the steering wheel. But I guarantee you won’t have the mental capacity to use them… Exit the pitlane, pin the throttle and W1 takes maybe a millisecond or two to gather its might (the gearing stretches to around 60mph in first, nearly 100mph in second, primarily to aid traction), but then lunges at the first turn with incredible ferocity. It instantly feels light, almost like inertia is no longer a thing. McLaren really does prize lightweight engineering, and at 3084lbs (dry) the W1 has a 278lbs advantage over the Ferrari F80. Plus, Ferrari uses figures for cars fitted with every single carbon fibre option. In reality, the gap is probably wider still. The impression of agility and stunning control continues as the track is unravelled at startling pace. The electric motor mounted to the side of the new 8-speed dual-clutch transmission is good for 342bhp and 324lb ft and it boosts any low rev lethargy the new flat-plane crank V8 might have (spoiler alert: It doesn’t appear to have any), so the W1 just feels massively, almost impossibly powerful at any revs. Even so, there’s real reward for wringing it out to 9200rpm and the power curve feels superheated but organic, too. In Race mode the steering – still hydraulically powered – has less assistance and it is noticeably heavier than other McLarens. However, that resistance is welcome as it gives you something to push against and imparts so much information about the front grip level. New Pirelli Trofeo RS tyres with a bigger front footprint than P1 or Senna really help. The front-end feels incredibly secure and the rear-axle follows with perfectly-aligned precision. The whole car feels super-stiff, completely locked into the surface and inspires confidence, but there’s an inherent agility and adjustability that means you’re quickly confident to push at its limits and really impose yourself on the chassis. It’s such a complex car but the driving experience is intuitive, and the driver feels a key contributor rather than just amazed (or terrified) observer, holding on for dear life. Every dynamic ingredient really is shockingly effective and yet has a subtlety and lightness of touch. From that delicious steering to the incredible brakes, the W1 just feels so mission-focussed, so hooked-up. Only the new 8-speed gearbox is a slightly disappointment. It’s fast and punchy, but after the scintillating energy of the Ferrari F80 ’box it feels competent rather than inspired. Other quibbles – it’s okay to quibble when the starting price is $2.1-million before tax and destination charge. Well, that new twin-turbocharged V8 sounds tightly wound and aggressive but if you have a P1 tucked in the garage you’ll miss the snorting, Darth Vader-style soundscape and all the drama that goes with it. Ferrari does this better, too. The F80 sounds deathly dull from the outside but is a riot of turbochargers, electric motors and all sorts of mechanical fury within the cockpit. Even so, the W1 is wildly entertaining on track, and the rear-drive configuration makes it more of a challenge and more satisfying than the F80 when chasing lap times or just sliding around for fun. In the Ferrari, you must second-guess what the front e-axle might do, whereas in the W1 it’s all on you. There are plenty of tools to help, including the ingenious Variable Drift Control, but somehow the W1 is more heroic. Or at least fools you into feeling more heroic – which is surely the point! On the road? Nimble, loaded with feel and sublime response. The ride is noticeably tougher than, say, a 750S but the control is ramped-up too, and with a bit more speed the whole car finds a delicious rhythm. Sport mode for the drivetrain brings some nice turbo whooshes and chirps, but the noise remains high-quality rather than extreme excitement. It is perhaps the one area the W1 feels just a little too tame. Of course, there’s nothing tame about the raw performance… which is genuinely shocking and literally hurts your neck muscles after a few hours. How McLaren has given the W1 such immense traction through just two driven wheels is beyond me. So, is it worthy of that ‘1’? I think so. Perhaps we won’t be talking about $25-million auction results for the W1 in 30 years from now, as we are for the F1. Perhaps it doesn’t quite have the amazing presence and jaw-dropping star quality of the simply gorgeous P1. But it is such an intense experience and the way it marries stunning track performance with delicate poise and entertainment on normal roads is something akin to magic. Maybe not ‘the one’ but definitely a searing, outrageous addition to McLaren’s fiercest family line. Just 399 W1’s will be built and they’re all sold. I’m not surprised at all. View All McLarens For Sale Images: McLaren Automotive

By Khris Bharath – September 14, 2026

Comparison: Porsche Taycan Vs Porsche Panamera

The Porsche Taycan and Porsche Panamera represent two very different approaches to the modern four-door performance Porsche. The Panamera remains rooted in combustion power, with Plug-In Hybrid technology available across much of its range, while the Taycan uses a dedicated electric vehicle platform. Both deliver serious performance, long-distance comfort, and everyday usability, but their driving dynamics and ownership demands differ considerably. The Panamera has served as Porsche's four-door grand tourer since 2009 and now spans three generations. Current models include gasoline-only and Plug-In Hybrid powertrains, while earlier generations added Executive variants and the second-generation Sport Turismo. The Taycan arrived for the 2020 model year as Porsche's first series-production electric vehicle, using an 800-volt architecture developed around rapid charging and strong performance. Across their current 2027 U.S. sedan ranges, Porsche offers eight Taycan variants and seven Panamera variants. Of those 15 configurations, the Porsche Taycan 4S and Porsche Panamera 4S E-Hybrid come closest to a direct comparison, with both using all-wheel drive and reaching 60 mph in 3.5 seconds. The Taycan produces up to 590 horsepower with Launch Control, while the Panamera develops 536 horsepower combined, giving us a useful starting point for comparing two fundamentally different approaches to the modern four-door Porsche. Those similarities provide a useful starting point before the comparison expands across the wider current ranges and into the pre-owned market, where additional body styles, powertrains, and performance levels broaden the choice considerably. Porsche Taycan Vs Porsche Panamera: Performance And Driving Dynamics For this comparison, we have chosen relatively representative configurations of both models to keep the focus on their underlying differences. Both cars offer extensive customization possibilities through Porsche's options catalog, so equipment, materials, colors, wheels, and individual specifications can vary considerably from one example to another. Coming to performance, the 2027 Taycan 4S also produces 590 horsepower with launch control using two electric motors and all-wheel drive. Porsche quotes the same 3.5-second sprint from zero to 60 mph, although top track speed drops to 155 mph. Its drivetrain delivers immediate response without depending on an engine's rev range or conventional transmission behavior. The 2027 Panamera 4S E-Hybrid combines a 2.9-liter twin-turbocharged V6 with an electric motor for 536 horsepower. An eight-speed PDK sends power through an all-wheel-drive system, while Porsche quotes 3.5 seconds from zero to 60 mph with the Sport Chrono Package and a quoted top track speed of 180 mph. The Taycan still uses a two-speed rear transaxle, while Porsche now offers an optional E-Shift system that simulates eight ratios. The system adds virtual shifts, acoustic feedback, and altered regenerative deceleration for greater interaction. Weight distribution, center of gravity, and power delivery create very different driving dynamics despite identical acceleration figures. The Panamera brings engine sound, turbocharged response, and gear changes, while the Taycan emphasizes immediate torque and consistent response. Those differences become more pronounced as you move farther up both current ranges. The Taycan GTS produces 690 horsepower and reaches 60 mph in 3.1 seconds, while the Panamera GTS produces 493 horsepower and takes 3.6 seconds. The Taycan Turbo raises output to 871 horsepower and cuts that sprint to 2.5 seconds, compared with 670 horsepower and 3.0 seconds for the Panamera Turbo E-Hybrid. At the flagship level, the Taycan Turbo GT produces 1,019 horsepower and reaches 60 mph in 2.2 seconds, compared with 771 horsepower and 2.8 seconds for the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid. However, the Panamera reaches 202 mph compared with 180 mph for the Taycan Turbo GT, illustrating how the Taycan increasingly emphasizes acceleration while the Panamera retains an advantage in outright top speed. Chassis technology provides more common ground, with Porsche Active Ride available on all-wheel-drive Taycan models and Panamera E-Hybrids, while both ranges also offer rear-axle steering for greater agility and low-speed maneuverability. Porsche Taycan vs Porsche Panamera: Efficiency And Charging Fuel economy requires a different comparison because each drivetrain measures efficiency through different standards. The Taycan 4S offers an EPA range of up to 295 miles, which should cover substantial daily mileage before another recharge becomes necessary. Tires & Wheels can also influence real-world efficiency, range, and ride quality. Charging infrastructure becomes central to the Taycan ownership experience, particularly during longer journeys. Its 800-volt electrical architecture supports DC fast charge rates of up to 320 kW with Performance Battery Plus when compatible charging equipment is available. Reliable home charging infrastructure can simplify daily use considerably, while public charging infrastructure matters more when your routine changes. Range Anxiety therefore depends heavily on where and how you use the car. But the ability for Porsche EVs to now plug into Tesla’s extensive Supercharger network (27,500 according to the latest statistics) across North America vastly changes the charging/ownership experience. The Panamera follows familiar refueling patterns, while E-Hybrid variants add short-distance electric capability through a hybrid system without removing the combustion engine. This Plug-In Hybrid layout can suit frequent long-distance travel because charging remains optional rather than essential. Exterior Dimensions And Body Styles The Panamera follows a traditional grand touring formula with a long hood and a fastback roofline. Previous generations include standard-wheelbase cars, longer Executive models, and the second-generation Sport Turismo. Porsche no longer offers that body style new, although pre-owned examples remain attractive when additional cargo space matters. The Taycan uses more futuristic proportions that trace directly back to Porsche's Mission E concept. Its Exterior Dimensions support a low nose, short front overhang, pronounced fenders, and heavily tapered roof. Porsche has offered the model as a Sport Sedan, Sport Turismo, and Cross Turismo throughout its production run. The Sport Turismo extends the roofline and improves practicality without adopting the Cross Turismo's crossover-inspired exterior treatment. The Cross Turismo adds extra ride height, protective body elements, and greater visual emphasis on rough-road versatility. These configurations also create direct used-market comparisons with long-roof Panamera examples. Interior & Storage Space Both cars employ Porsche's modern infotainment system, although their cabins approach the four-door performance formula differently. The Taycan places you low inside the car and surrounds the seating position with multiple displays. Its packaging reflects the absence of a conventional combustion drivetrain and supports a more overtly digital atmosphere. The Panamera maintains a stronger grand touring emphasis, especially when rear seat comfort matters on longer journeys. Available features can include ventilation, massage functions, and other equipment intended to make extended travel more comfortable. Body style also influences Interior & Storage Space and usable cargo capacity. A Taycan Sport Turismo or Cross Turismo provides easier cargo access than the Sport Sedan, while a used long-roof Panamera delivers similar flexibility with combustion power. Cargo capacity varies meaningfully by body style. The Taycan 4S sedan offers 14.4 cubic feet behind the rear seats plus a 2.9-cubic-foot front trunk, while the Cross Turismo expands rear space to 15.8 cubic feet and 42.8 with its seats folded. The Sport Turismo provides similar long-roof versatility. The Panamera 4S E-Hybrid offers 15.2 cubic feet, expanding to 44.6, while previous Panamera Sport Turismo models reached as much as 18.4 cubic feet and 49 cubic feet with their rear seats folded. Porsche Taycan Vs. Porsche Panamera: Price and Pre-Owned Values Pricing remains surprisingly close across several comparable versions. The rear-wheel-drive 2027 Taycan starts at $111,900, while the gasoline-powered Panamera starts at $113,000. The all-wheel-drive Taycan 4 costs $116,000, compared with $120,400 for the Panamera 4. The Taycan 4S costs $131,800, while the Panamera 4S E-Hybrid starts at $139,100. The Taycan 4S produces up to 590 horsepower with Launch Control, compared with 536 horsepower combined for the Panamera 4S E-Hybrid, although both reach 60 mph in 3.5 seconds. At the top of their ranges, the Taycan Turbo GT costs $243,700, while the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid starts at $245,200. Pre-owned inventory broadens the comparison considerably because three Panamera generations cover more than 15 years. Naturally aspirated engines, turbocharged V6 and V8 models, hybrids, GTS variants, Turbos, Executive versions, and long-roof cars can all appear within the same search. A fixed budget may therefore place an older high-performance Panamera beside a much newer entry-level example. The Taycan offers a younger pool of used cars because production began for the 2020 model year. Depending on current inventory, the same budget may include a 4S, GTS, Turbo, Turbo S, Cross Turismo, or another configuration. Early depreciation can also make a used Taycan Turbo particularly compelling against newer and less powerful versions. The Panamera provides considerably more variety because its production history extends back to 2009. Market data changes constantly, so condition, mileage, equipment, and warranty coverage should guide any final decision. The pre-owned market also introduces different inspection priorities for each model and powertrain. With a Taycan, examine battery health, charging performance, warranty coverage, tire condition, specifications, and software update history before purchase. With a Panamera, service history becomes increasingly important as age and mechanical complexity increase. Suspension systems, engine maintenance, transmission servicing, and the hybrid system deserve close attention depending on the generation involved. Older examples also vary considerably in mileage, specification, and previous maintenance. View All Porsche Taycans for Sale View All Porsche Panameras for Sale Images: Porsche

By Khris Bharath – May 24, 2026

Comparison: Ferrari F40 Vs Porsche 959

When the Porsche 959 first arrived in the United States in the late 1980s, it was so technically advanced that it failed federal crash-test and emissions standards, leaving examples ordered by Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld sitting in US customs warehouses, legally undriveable. Gates reportedly waited over a decade until Congress passed the Show or Display exemption in 1999. The Ferrari F40, unveiled around the same time, needed no such workaround. Stripped of every conceivable luxury and cleared through every regulatory gate without issue, it was founder Enzo Ferrari's final act, a true supercar built with no concessions to comfort or technology, created to mark Ferrari's 40th anniversary. The 959 was Porsche's engineering manifesto, developed partly to dominate the Paris-Dakar Rally and prove that all-wheel drive, active torque distribution, and sequential turbocharging could coexist in a street-legal production car. Factory 959 entries won the 1986 Paris-Dakar Rally outright, taking first and second place. But why compare them now? Back in January this year, a Ferrari F40 from the Phil and Martha Bachman collection sold at Mecum Kissimmee for $6.6 million, breaking the previous public record of $3.97 million by more than $2.6 million. Two Bachman F40s crossed the block the same day at no reserve, carrying 456 and 865 miles in US specification, with subsequent F40 auction appearances ranging from Amelia Island to Monaco, and recently at Mecum Indy and Villa d'Este. January's record-breaking result was enough to prompt a closer look at the F40's most direct contemporary from the '80s, i.e., the 959, Porsche's first halo car, considerably rarer at just 292 series production examples against the F40's 1,315. Both cars claim some version of the title of the world's fastest production car, both sitting around the 200 mph mark. Ferrari F40 vs Porsche 959: Performance The F40 runs a 2.9-liter twin-turbocharged V8 producing 471 horsepower and 426 pound-feet of torque. Both IHI turbos spool simultaneously, which means lag is present below 4,000 rpm and demands full attention past it. Power goes exclusively to the rear wheels through a five-speed gated manual. At 2,425 pounds, the factory claimed 60 mph in approximately 3.8 seconds and a 201 mph top speed, making the F40 the first production car to exceed 200 mph. There is no ABS, no traction control, and no electronic safety net of any kind. The 959 takes a mechanically different position. It's a 2.85-liter flat-six that uses water-cooled cylinder heads on an otherwise air-cooled block, a configuration Porsche developed specifically to manage thermal loads at high output. The sequential twin-turbo setup runs a smaller unit at low rpm to minimize lag, then a larger unit at higher revs to sustain pull. Output is rated at 450 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. The 959 reaches 60 mph in approximately 3.6 seconds and tops out at 197 mph. The PSK all-wheel drive system distributes torque electronically between axles through four driver-selectable programs, ranging from locked four-wheel drive to a rear-biased split for dry conditions. Standard ABS and a tire pressure monitoring system complete a technology package that most performance manufacturers would not attempt for another 15 years. At roughly 770 pounds heavier than the F40, it earns that edge off the line through mechanical grip rather than reduced mass. The 959 Sport, built in just 29 units, deleted the rear seats, sound insulation, and air conditioning, trimmed weight to approximately 2,977 pounds, and raised output to approximately 515 horsepower. Ferrari F40 vs Porsche 959 Specifications Metric Ferrari F40 Porsche 959 Engine 2.9L Twin-Turbo V8 2.85L Twin-Sequential Turbo Flat-6 Power 471 hp @ 7,000 rpm 450 hp @ 6,500 rpm Torque 426 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm 369 lb-ft @ 5,500 rpm Transmission 5-speed manual 6-speed manual Drivetrain Rear-wheel drive All-wheel drive (PSK) 0-60 mph ~3.8 sec ~3.6 sec Top Speed 201 mph 197 mph Curb Weight ~2,425 lbs ~3,197 lbs Ferrari F40 vs Porsche 959: Exterior Design and Interior The F40's body, designed by Pininfarina under Pietro Camardella, treats every surface as a functional element. The fixed rear wing, with "F40" embossed on the endplates, generates downforce without adjustment. NACA ducts along the flanks feed cooling air directly to the engine and brakes. The body panels are Kevlar and carbon composite bonded with resin, chosen for weight reduction. Pop-up headlights date it to the decade, but the overall shape, low, wide, and sharply angled, reads immediately from any distance. Inside, there is exposed carbon fiber, a bare transmission tunnel, thin racing seats, and manual window cranks. No carpet, no sound insulation, and no barrier between the cabin and the heat the twin-turbo system generates. The 959 takes the widened 911 silhouette from the time and broadens it substantially, flaring the rear haunches to cover a significantly wider track and accommodate the PSK drivetrain underneath. Flush-mounted windows, a retractable rear spoiler, and Kevlar-aramid composite body panels manage aerodynamic loads without visual drama. Hollow-spoke magnesium wheels came standard. Inside, leather seats, air conditioning, a full instrument cluster, and a PSK rotary switch with four torque distribution programs reflect Porsche's intent to build a grand tourer as much as a performance car. Both cars use rear mesh panels for heat dissipation and engine visibility. Ferrari F40 vs Porsche 959: Price, Collectibility, and Market duPont REGISTRY put the F40 on its cover in June 1996, when examples traded at a fraction of today's market value. Thirty years later, the publication's proprietary dRi value for the same car sits at $3,141,012, and the Bachman example that crossed the block at Mecum Kissimmee in January 2026 sold for $6.6 million. That result is significant but not a new floor. The car that set it carried 456 miles in US specification, placing it among the lowest-mileage F40s ever offered publicly. US-spec cars account for just 211 of the 1,315 produced and have historically commanded a premium currently estimated at 8.3% over European counterparts, driven by lower average mileage at sale and relative rarity within an already limited run. The F40 is part of Ferrari's Big Five and has continued to appear at multiple auction houses since Kissimmee with consistent demand. The 10.3% May 2026 pullback in dRi data is the market finding its level after an exceptional result. duPont REGISTRY Garage is available on the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Start tracking your collector car portfolio value today The scale of that appreciation sharpens against the publication's own archive. duPont REGISTRY's September 2013 issue headlined a $6.2 million Ferrari collection featuring three cars, one of which was an F40. The Bachman car that crossed the block at Mecum Kissimmee in January 2026 fetched $6.6 million on its own. The entire 2013 collection costs less than one car today. Per dR Garage, the F40's dRi value stands at $3,141,012. Across 129 recorded price points since 2015, total auction volume has reached $298.4 million at a 9% compound annual growth rate, representing 156% appreciation from the 2015 baseline. Within the European production run, early non-cat, non-adjust examples, built before emissions hardware was added, carry the highest premiums. All seven top European-specification public sales have involved non-cat, non-adjust cars. The F40 LM and GT competition variants, developed with Michelotto to produce up to 720 horsepower, trade as a separate asset class entirely. The 959 presents a more compelling analytical case than its current pricing suggests. duPont REGISTRY's April 2015 30th Anniversary Issue placed the 959 alongside the Carrera GT and 918 Spyder as Porsche's three defining halo cars. That editorial position still holds. The market has not caught up with it. The 959 preceded both successors, influenced both, and did more to define Porsche's engineering reputation on the world stage than either. Its current dRi value of $1,735,649 sits at a significant discount to where that history would place it. Two factors may change that. The first is supply: with just 53 recorded price points since 2015 and a total auction volume of $71.7 million, the 959 trades infrequently enough that a single well-documented result at the right auction could reprice the segment in a session. The second is attention: the Canepa 959 SC, a modernized interpretation of the platform, has brought fresh collector focus to the original car. In duPont Registry's current market rankings, the Porsche 959 sits at #7, two spots ahead of the Ferrari F40 at #9, among the top gainers of the past year. Per dR Garage, the 959 Komfort's dRi value stands at $1,735,649, with the market ranging from $1,105,000 to $2,300,000 at a 5% compound annual growth rate since 2015. May 2026 data shows the market essentially flat, up $10,000 (0.4%). Every US-registered example entered through the Show or Display exemption post-1999. Verify import documentation before proceeding, as gaps affect registration and insurance. The 959 Sport, one of 29 built, trades considerably higher when it surfaces. Ferrari F40 vs Porsche 959 Price Metric Ferrari F40 Porsche 959 Komfort Original MSRP ~$400,000 ~$225,000 dRi Market Value (2026) $3,141,012 $1,735,649 Market Low $1,792,500 $1,105,000 Market High $6,600,000 (Mecum Kissimmee, Jan 2026) $2,300,000 Appreciation Since 2015 +156% +66% CAGR +9% +5% Total Auction Volume (2015–2026) $298,412,123 $71,666,389 Recorded Price Points 129 53 Production Numbers 1,315 units (211 US-spec) 292 road cars + 29 Sport Key Value Drivers Spec, mileage, color Import documentation, mileage, and Sport variant Years Built 1987–1992 1986–1988 ***dRi values and market data sourced from dR Garage by duPont REGISTRY. This is a market assessment only and does not constitute investment advice. Values fluctuate, and past performance is not indicative of future results. View All Supercars and Exotic Cars For Sale Images: Ferrari, Porsche, Charles Bradley, duPont REGISTRY Garage

Ferrari Amalfi Spider Vs. Ferrari Roma Spider

By Khris Bharath – March 14, 2026

Ferrari Amalfi Spider Vs. Ferrai Roma Spider

Eight months ago, in early July, when Ferrari showcased the Roma’s successor, the Amalfi, we did an in-depth comparison between the two coupes. With the Amalfi Spider variant dropping earlier this week, it was only natural to pit it against the Roma Spider. The new Ferrari Amalfi Spider extends the Italian marque’s front-engine V8 grand touring formula into open-top territory, pairing the coupe’s refinements with the long tradition of Ferrari convertible GTs, a lineage that stretches back nearly 70 years, beginning with models like the 250 GT California Spyder. The tradition later continued through the 365 GTS/4 Daytona Spider, 550 Barchetta, California, Portofino, and eventually the Roma Spider. The Amalfi Spider now carries that legacy forward, and having recently savored the Amalfi coupe and reviewed the Roma Spider not long before, this comparison is especially relevant to see how it compares to both models. Exterior Design Ferrari’s Centro Stile, led by Flavio Manzoni, mainly focused their efforts on the front and rear sections. As with the coupe, the Roma Spider’s body-colored perforated grille is gone. In its place sits a cleaner front fascia with a wide horizontal air intake, while lighting and sensors now sit within a darker recessed section. The hood also features a flatter bulge when compared to the Roma Spider. The result ties the Amalfi Spider more closely to newer Ferraris such as the Daytona SP3 and 12Cilindri. Viewed from the side, the Amalfi Spider retains the same elegant classic front-engine rear drive proportions that defined the Roma Spider. The long hood, rear-set cabin, and muscular rear haunches remain signatures of Ferrari’s front-engine architecture. The key differentiators are a more pronounced crease and newer wheel designs for the Amalfi Spider. Ferrari also introduces Rosso Tramonto, a metallic red with warm orange undertones inspired by the Mediterranean sky at sunset. At the rear, the biggest visual changes are around the taillights and the placement of the license plate. The Amalfi Spider features a three-position active spoiler that adjusts automatically depending on speed and load. In its most aggressive setting, it generates 243 pounds of additional downforce at 155 mph. A larger carbon fiber diffuser and revised rear surfacing also give the tail a wider, more planted look than the Roma Spider. As for the more functional bits and aerodynamic improvements, small air channels above the headlights reduce pressure over the front end while feeding cooling air into the engine bay. Beneath the bodywork, vortex generators and revised underbody aero improve airflow management. Overall, this is still a restrained Ferrari by modern standards, subtle, smooth, and more classic GT than extrovert supercar. Design is, of course, subjective, and while the Amalfi Spider looks cleaner and more technical, some will still prefer the Roma Spider’s more sculpted, organic surfacing. Each to their own. Interior Design Inside, just as with the coupe, Ferrari has made some significant changes. The Roma Spider relied heavily on touch-sensitive steering wheel controls, and while its waterfall-style center console and flowing dashboard looked dramatic, the interface itself was never especially intuitive. The Amalfi Spider fixes that. Ferrari has replaced the touch surfaces with physical buttons and tactile switches, while also bringing back the iconic anodized aluminum engine start button mounted on the steering wheel. The dash retains Ferrari’s dual-cockpit architecture, but the layout is more straightforward than before. A 15.6-inch digital instrument cluster sits behind the wheel, supported by a 10.25-inch landscape infotainment display and an 8.8-inch passenger screen that shows performance data. Wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, and wireless charging are standard. Visually, the Roma Spider cabin still appears more dramatic in some respects, with its center display integrated more fluidly into the dashboard, whereas the Amalfi’s layout is more functional and upright. But on usability alone, the Amalfi Spider is the clear winner. Like the Roma Spider, the Amalfi Spider remains a 2+ configuration, meaning the rear seats are best reserved for children or extra luggage. Ferrari also integrates a wind deflector between the rear seats that deploys electronically to reduce turbulence during open-top driving. Finally, the soft top remains central to the car’s identity and deploys in just 13.5 seconds, and you can operate it at speeds up to 37 mph, folding into a compact 8.7-inch stack. Ferrari says the five-layer fabric roof provides insulation close to that of the brand’s retractable hard-top systems. As for cargo volume (this is a long-distance GT after all), you’re looking at 9.0 cubic feet with the roof up and 6.1 cubic feet when down. For some context, the Aston Martin Vanquish Volante offers 7.7 cubic feet with the roof up and 6.6 cubic feet with the roof down. Ferrari Amalfi Spider vs Roma Spider Performance Both cars feature Ferrari’s F154 90° Twin-Turbo V8 3.9-liter twin-turbocharged V8, paired with an eight-speed dual-clutch transmission that sends power exclusively to the rear wheels. However, Ferrari has further developed the engine for the Amalfi Spider, increasing output while improving throttle response and turbocharger control. Compared with the Roma Spider, the Amalfi Spider gains 28 horsepower, for a total of 640 horsepower, while maintaining the same torque figure of 560 pound-feet. With a 3.3-second dash to 62 mph, it is slightly quicker over the Roma Spider, but both maintain the same 199 mph top speed with the roof down. The Amalfi Spider further benefits from meaningful chassis upgrades. Ferrari introduces brake-by-wire technology, improving braking precision and pedal feel. Carbon-ceramic brakes work with ABS Evo and Side Slip Control 6.1 to sharpen stability and confidence under hard braking. The structural reinforcements do result in a weight gain, with Ferrari listing the Amalfi Spider’s dry weight at 3,431 pounds, which makes it about 190 pounds heavier than the Amalfi coupe’s 3,241-pound dry weight. 2027 Ferrari Amalfi Spider Price & Availability Pricing for the Amalfi coupe begins around $280,000, and the Spider will likely command a premium, pushing well-equipped examples beyond $300,000 once Ferrari’s extensive options list is factored in. Key rivals include the Aston Martin DB12 Volante, Bentley Continental GTC, Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet, and Mercedes-AMG SL 63. Ultimately, the Amalfi Spider does not attempt to reinvent Ferrari’s convertible GT concept. Instead, it builds on the Roma Spider with improved usability, sharper aerodynamics, more tactile controls, and slightly stronger performance. The Roma Spider may still be the more expressive design, but the Amalfi Spider is the more resolved car. Finally, the name itself. Where Roma referenced the glamour of Italy’s capital, the Eternal City, and the spirit of La Nuova Dolce Vita, Amalfi, by contrast, takes its name from one of Italy’s most glamorous regions, which has some spectacular coastal roads. While it’s a great name for the coupe, it is truly fitting for the cabriolet and naturally belongs on an elegant front-engine rear-wheel drive Ferrari convertible like this one. View All Ferraris For Sale Images: Ferrari

Features

duPont REGISTRY News

duPont REGISTRY Group

Support

Subscribe